NO CLIMATE CHANGE

Climategate (CG), the scandal that, thanks to an anonymous web hacker, revealed the exchange of e-mails, which occurred in the period 1996-2009, between a small team of climate "scientists", very cheaters, from which it was deduced how they had completely falsified the data to make it appear on purpose that that of the last half of the last century was an unprecedented warming. They are not ordinary people: it is precisely those who had the responsibility to compile that part of the IPCC report (the UN Committee proposed to study the anthropic contribution to the planet's climate) which states that the current global warming (GR) is "without previous "and is" of anthropogenic origin ".
The main actors of the CG are two: Phil Jones (PJ), hydraulic engineer and Director of the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University in England and Mike Mann (MM) of the American University of Pennsylvania, a failed physicist in his field. and who, devoting himself to the climate, became famous for the “golf club” graph that shows how the current RG would be “unprecedented”. As we will see, the graph turned out to be an artfully constructed scientific fake. The list of senders and / or recipients of e-mails includes other minor elements of the band and some external ones. That the current GR should be "unprecedented" was already decided by the World Meteorological Organization (Omm), which declared in the 1985 congress: "we believe that due to anthropogenic emissions we could witness an unprecedented increase in the global average temperature" . PJ and MM set out to become famous by giving substance to the prediction of the Omm, and they did so by conspiring the biggest scientific scandal of the century, as emerges from the exchange of their e-mails: just read them. It is they themselves who in e-mails refer to themselves as "conspirators".
For example, to determine past temperatures when thermometric data did not exist, these grabbers had decided that measuring the thickness of tree rings was a good "gauge" of a thermometer. It is not, and other independent "indicators" were needed for this. The person studying the problem was a certain K. Briffa, a collaborator of PJ. To PJ, MM and others of the Briffa team he sent the following e-mail: "I know they put a lot of pressure on us to present a decent story that justifies an" evident warming unprecedented in the last 1000 years or more ", but the reality is that the situation is not that simple. We don't have a lot of data from independent "indicators", and what we have does not coincide with the recent warming ».
This means that the indicators, wrong on the current temperatures, were therefore not reliable on the temperatures of the past, when there were no thermometric data and, consequently, it was not legitimate to argue that today's high temperatures were "unprecedented". But here's how the two main conspirators responded. MM: "Everyone here at the IPCC agrees that Briffa's is a problem and a potential distraction / detractor from the consensus we would like to convey. It would then be appropriate for us to invent "something else" as responsible for the discrepancy. Maybe Briffa has some ideas about it? We absolutely have to write a few lines otherwise skeptics will tell us we don't understand our own results. "
Another recurring theme that emerges from the e-mails is the determination with which the team influenced which articles should be published and which rejected. The field in question is very small and, almost inevitably, the articles in the sector ended up on the desk of at least one of the critical review team: they purposely rejected all articles that questioned the so-called consensus and accepted those that supported that consensus. I don't quote examples for the sake of brevity, but it is fun to exchange emails between PJ and MM to understand how PJ, a hydraulic engineer, was awarded a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU). Pay attention to the dates. MM wrote to PJ (December 2007): «I'm trying to get you an award from AGU. They told me that the Ewing medal would not be appropriate. Let me know what you prefer and let me know ". PJ chooses his award: «Becoming a Fellow of the AGU would be fine». MM to PJ (June 2008): “I'm putting together 5 letters of recommendation for that AGU award. Together with mine as proponent - even if I am not yet a Fellow - they make 6 letters ».
In one of the final e-mails of this deplorable saga, when the scandal was already coming to light with the first e-mails revealed, Kevin Trenberth, one of the conspiratorial team, wrote disconsolately to the others (we are in October 2009): "The the fact is that we are unable to justify the lack of heating in the last 10 years ”. But, in a last desperate attempt, he wondered: “Maybe the measurements are wrong. Our observation system is inadequate ". Obviously without realizing that, if that were the case, the entire climatology, as told by 97% of self-styled climatologists, is a bluff. Maybe he was right.

PLANET STORM

Some time ago when someone said that something very bad was going to happen, no one believed it. Now everyone wants to run for cover. Retreat to the mountains and wait for the internet to jump, for all technology to collapse. Because this will happen too and we will not be here watching videos but out there trying to survive.
How long have we known that our planet is in danger? We all think that this ecological awareness is recent, that we started talking about the climate only about twenty years ago. But are we sure that we do not send it even earlier? Are you sure no one had talked about it yet? The first “manuscript found” is The suicidal society: requiem for an infected planet, by Gordon Rattray Taylor, from 1970 (in Italy it arrived, for the Mondadori types, in 1971. The original subtitle was a little more hopeful: Mankind can survive! The Doomsday Book). An entire chapter, the third, is titled “Ice Age or Heat Death?”, And tells of the discussions between the supporters of two theses then present. At the time, the earth’s temperature had not yet started the last step of the so-called hockey stick – a term used to describe the period, in the seventies / eighties, which saw a decisive and definitive rise in the earth’s temperature.
If the idea was abandoned by science in the seventies, it was not forgotten by the media. Newsweek weekly in 1975 titled a cover story “The Cooling World”. Many deniers clung to this and other generalist media articles even in the following decades (even after 2000, as Crichton did in 2004) to disprove the idea of ​​man-made global warming. The myth therefore, like a phoenix, occasionally resurrects, as evidenced by this debunking article by Climate Feedback.
The next book is the historian The closing circle, by Barry Commoner (The closing circle: the first American edition is from 1971). On page 39 of the first book he states: Now we are burning these fossil fuels, and therefore the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air starts to rise again: the effect that this phenomenon could have on the Earth’s temperature is the subject of lively discussions by scientists.
Do we think that desertification is in our distant future? Could it be 50 or 100 years to go to have a destroyed soil? We perhaps believe that we will not live in that future and therefore we are calm and instead of knowing the truth and seeing the real data of what is happening to our planet we read romance novels, thrillers, and a lot of other stuff, to forget our lousy life and the disgust humans are causing around the planet. But will all this happen Romans or is it already happening today? It is useless to be there crying for memories, past loves, weddings, projects, ideas .. We are destroying our planet and there is no time. There is no more time. Action must be taken now. Now!!!

 

Do we think that desertification is in our distant future? Could it be 50 or 100 years to go to have a destroyed soil? We perhaps believe that we will not live in that future and therefore we are calm and instead of knowing the truth and seeing the real data of what is happening to our planet we read romance novels, thrillers, and a lot of other stuff, to forget our lousy life and the disgust humans are causing around the planet. But will all this happen Romans or is it already happening today? It is useless to be there crying for memories, past loves, weddings, projects, ideas .. We are destroying our planet and there is no time. There is no more time. Action must be taken now. Now!!!

The ice sheet covering Greenland is melting at such an accelerated rate that it is now believed likely that it has passed the point of no return and may represent a primary factor in global sea level rise over the next two decades. . The entire Arctic, according to the most recent studies by the American National Academy of Science, is warming at twice the rate of the rest of the planet and the melting of the Greenland ice is the most visible effect. The ice loss had been estimated at 400 billion tons in 2012 alone, about four times more than in 2003. After a stagnation in 2013-2014, explained by the North Atlantic Oscillation, in recent years the process has accelerated again and the The conclusion is that in all likelihood the forecasts of the effects of global warming on the planet have so far been too conservative. The reality appears to be more serious than expected.

%d bloggers like this: